![]() Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. ![]() (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr)Īccess additional case information on PACER (Sanford, Joshua)ĬOMPLAINT- CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION against Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc, filed by Kinyatta Ringo and Ayonna Pennington. 20. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc served on. SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kinyatta Ringo, Ayonna Pennington. Molloy on behalf of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc (Molloy, Catherine) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc (Molloy, Catherine) Bench Trial set for at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom #1A before Judge D. INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by. RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Ayonna Pennington, Kinyatta Ringo. The defendants now move to dismiss Yates’ complaint for failure to state a claim. and Vibes Media, LLC, alleging that the defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by repeatedly sending her commercial advertisements via text message. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Ringo and Pennington have adequately pleaded plausible wage claims. The plaintiff, Madeleine Yates, brings this action against Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |